Colorado’s sanctuary city policies are under scrutiny amid rising criminal activities by Venezuelan gangs, causing a heated debate over security measures.
Quick Takes
- Mayor Johnston defends Denver’s immigration policies despite rising crime rates linked to Venezuelan gangs.
- Tren de Aragua has increased its activities in Colorado, exploiting sanctuary policies.
- District Attorney George Brauchler criticizes local government actions on gang issues.
- Federal funding threats loom amid allegations of providing safe harbor to criminals.
Denver’s Policies Under Fire
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston recently defended the city’s immigration policies at a House Committee hearing, alongside other city leaders like those from Boston and New York. The hearing witnessed Republican criticism, accusing mayors of ineffective leadership as violent gangs gained a foothold. Johnston maintained that Denver complies with all state and federal laws while managing a significant influx of migrants.
Johnston reiterated that Denver is committed to protecting its residents, highlighting that the city’s crime rates have decreased despite the challenges. He advised that Congress should resolve national immigration issues rather than hold city governments accountable. However, some Republicans suggested withholding federal funds, prompting Johnston to express readiness to litigate if necessary.
The Venezuelan Gang Threat
Tren de Aragua (TdA), a Venezuelan gang, has been increasing its presence in Denver, perceived as their American headquarters due to existing immigration policies. District Attorney George Brauchler voiced concerns about how these policies have created ‘safe harbors’ for such groups. Brauchler highlighted efforts by these gangs to infiltrate areas such as apartment complexes in Aurora.
“The illegal immigrant gang Tren de Aragua targeted Denver to be their American HQ because of weak immigration laws,” Republican Colorado Rep. Gabe Evans said.
State policies that limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities have intensified debate over security and policy consequences. Criticism involves reduced funding to public safety to support migrant programs, resulting in increased vulnerability to criminal activities.
A National Issue with Local Consequences
Colorado’s political landscape, championed by a Democratic majority, continues to reinforce sanctuary policies, reportedly affecting the enforcement of immigration laws. Proposed laws could further protect undocumented immigrants, increasing the challenge for law enforcement. Meanwhile, Johnston pledged to resist federal policies under the previous administration, highlighting the struggle between local and national government priorities.
“My sense of those answers, though, were intended to deflect from the underlying and key question here. And that is, can a city, should a state stick itself between illegal aliens and the federal law? And the answer is a very obvious and easy no,” Brauchler said when discussing Johnston’s approach to the situation at the hearing.
As public safety concerns rise, hospital and school infrastructures face overwhelming pressure, and Colorado communities have seen increased distribution of narcotics such as fentanyl. The debate over sanctuary city policies in Colorado highlights a broader national conversation on the balance between immigration practices and ensuring public safety.
