Inside Russia’s New Missile Doctrine: What the Oreshnik Reveals

Ukraine Russia war

The Oreshnik missile’s debut in Ukraine showcases Russia’s strategic ambitions and challenges global nuclear policies.

At a Glance

  • This is the first combat deployment of the Oreshnik missile at Dnipro.
  • Russia demonstrates psychological warfare through missile capabilities.
  • Oreshnik’s potential impacts on nuclear deterrence and military strategies are explored.
  • International negotiations are under pressure due to missile deployment.

Background of the Oreshnik Missile

Russia’s unveiling of the Oreshnik missile has stirred discussions globally. Its ability to travel at Mach 11 speeds and deliver multiple warheads was demonstrated during its attack on Dnipro. This event marked the first use of such advanced ballistic technology in combat, underscoring Russia’s evolving military capabilities. However, its purpose extends beyond physical destruction, significantly impacting psychological strategic landscapes, escalating tensions among nuclear stakeholders.

The missile’s design is based on the RS-26 Rubezh model, distinguished by its multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) configuration, allowing for the deployment of conventional and nuclear payloads over a 3,100-mile range. Despite its capabilities, experts emphasize the strategic rather than combative role it plays in international relations.

Russia’s Strategic Calculus

The deployment seeks to instill fear among Ukraine and its Western allies, serving as a form of psychological warfare. This approach pressures Europe into negotiating while demonstrating Russia’s missile prowess. However, operational constraints exist; despite the Oreshnik’s advanced technology, large stockpiles are necessary for effective deterrence—a luxury Russia currently lacks. The prohibitive cost also limits widespread usage in favor of less expensive alternatives.

“The way that they updated the nuclear doctrine that was not too significant. It was updated to be a little bit more threatening, but the spirit of the thing is very much the same. Again, we look at it in terms of the overall Russian strategy of persuading countries supporting Ukraine that it’s going to cost them more in every sense to continue to support Ukraine than it would to make a quick peace and get out,” said John Erath, senior policy director for the Center for Arms Control and Proliferation.

Both NATO and Russian commentators view this missile as part of a competitive arms strategy reminiscent of Cold War negotiations. The missile remains outside New START Treaty limitations but reflects Russia’s shift from arms reduction interest towards emphasizing its nuclear and conventional deterrent capabilities.

Implications for International Security

Internationally, the Oreshnik missile’s introduction is stimulating debates regarding the balance of power and strategic stability. Belarus’s interest in hosting the missile presents additional security complications in Eastern Europe. Western analysts remain skeptical about significant alterations in battlefield dynamics, viewing the missile as an intimidation tool rather than a definitive game-changer.

“What we need now is not to improve the nuclear doctrine, but the ‘Oreshnik,’ because enough of these modern weapons systems puts us on the verge of virtually eliminating the need to employ nuclear weapons,” said Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The tensions heightened by the missile could potentially shift warfare tactics. The ongoing development and deployment of such missiles highlight Russia’s focus on advanced technology and its sustained military evolution. Going forward, it is essential for nations to navigate these complexities to maintain or restore strategic stability.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR